Secularism is deeply constituted in Indian culture and it’s become a classic example of beat to different cultures across the world for its distinctive laic characteristics. A number of the prominent laic options of Indian culture embrace unity in diversity, tolerance with universal acceptance and mutual respect for non secular practices of different religions. The Constitution of our country doesn’t provide any explicit religion with religion of state. Preamble to the constitution of our country assures equality of the standing and chance and guarantees liberty of thought, expression, belief and worship. Additionally, the constitution guarantees special protection to minorities, non secular or linguistic groups beneath Article 29 to 30, to preserve their language, script or culture and to determine and administer institution of their alternative. However the terms, ‘Secularism’ and ‘Minority’ are a unit terribly dynamic and have neither been outlined within the Constitution nor in any statutory provisions. To bridge the gap between the minority and therefore the majority on one hand varied schemes are launched by the union and therefore the regime however on the other hand despite of the Constitutional provisions, statutory laws and government endeavors, the condition of minorities in India has not improved to the specified level.
HINDU MUSLIM RIOTS IN BENGAL
Religion is an integral part of all civil societies and its importance each to the individual and society is being universally recognized. Even the states that professed anti- god and anti faith ideology have enclosed the liberty to faith as a Fundamental Right in their Constitution. However, the form and structure of this right to faith take issue from nation to nation relying upon their socio-cultural conditions and a lot of notably on the Constitutional ideology of the country. This study is an effort to look at the concept of Secular system and therefore the rights to freedom of faith in our country from the ideologist perspective of Indian Secularistic system. The word secular clearly indicates that the state does not have a religion of its own and it cannot favor any particular religion. This clearly indicates that the state cannot finance for the religious practices of its people or it cannot use the public money for the purpose of spending on religious affairs of a particular religion. But in India, the state is very much involved in financing the religious pilgrimage of various religions. It mainly started when the UPA government started giving subsidy on the Haj pilgrimage. Many organizations, especially the Hindu groups opposed this decision of the government and called it a decision taken in order to appease the minority community for the purpose of the vote bank politics. Thereafter, similar schemes were launched by the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh under which both Hindus and Muslims were provided with the free travel by way of special trains and buses to offer their pilgrimage. These kind of practices by the government are not good for the secular and democratic character of the state.
In the past few years, there have been attempts to build up an atmosphere around the country that the country is growing intolerant under the new government and the fringe elements among the Hindus are being a free hand. The issue of cow vigilantes taking law into their own hand has been covered in the mainstream media and indeed it is a serious law and order challenge before the government. Two such incidents which hit the headlines are the lynching of the Muslim man Akhlaq in Dadri, Uttar Pradesh and recently a Muslim man was killed by the cow vigilantes in Alwar, Rajasthan. Apart from the issue of cow protection, there have certain other issues also which can cause a dent to the secular image of our country. There have been several other issues like Ghar Wapsi Campaign, the issue of Love Jihad, Triple Talaq, Beef Ban, the issue of Intolerance etc are the issues which have proved to be of grave concern for the country. It has been alleged by certain Human Rights groups that the minorities are being targeted under the new government and there are attempts being made to make India a Hindu State. Recently there was controversy over the statement of singer Sonu Nigam in which he said that the use of loudspeaker for the purpose of making Azaan from Mosque interferes in his right to life and privacy. All these kind of issues are raised up and there are chances
that tensions can build up between the religious communities. So, these kind of issues requires a solution with due care and attention of the government.
The advanced state of affairs around Religion has perpetually been ready to capture one’s notice, it’s intriguing to examine that Religion precedes all civilized nations, moreover, it’s the binding difficulty that brought societies along, yet, and it still remains a fibre question for the civilized societies/nation to answer. on what extent it ought to be unbroken outside the affairs of state or on what extent a personal ought to be allowed to exercise his right wing wherever it doesn’t become a nemesis for others. The matter becomes far more audacious once the proper is exercised in Republic of India, right from ‘Ghar Wapsi’ to ‘Santhara’ to ‘Triple Talaq’. The liberty of faith has all the ingredients for the creating of a Monty Python’s classic (controversial however factual).
However, it’ll be fascinating to examine that the majority of the spiritual practices square measure the gifts of the traditional instead of a attribute of the modern. Immanuel Kant once aforesaid in his celestial work ‘Groundwork of Metaphysics’ that creature is endued with ‘free will’. Associate in Nursing it’s this powerfulness that allows a person to decide on an action over the other; however within the matter of faith, as if the dynamic changes quickly, as most of the spiritual practices square measure in remission by the dictates of the past and every one that a personal is left with is associate in Nursing apelike attribute of header these practices. In these eventualities, it’s laborious to digest that one very is sweat his freedom within the true sense.